For 2024, the Social Security wage cap will be $168,600, and social security and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits will increase by 3.2 percent. These changes reflect cost-of-living adjustments to account for inflation.

The IRS announced tax relief for individuals and businesses affected by terrorist attacks in the State of Israel. The IRS would continue to monitor events and may provide additional relief.

The IRS announced tax relief for individuals and businesses affected by terrorist attacks in the State of Israel. The IRS would continue to monitor events and may provide additional relief.

Filing and Payment Deadlines Extended

The IRS extended certain deadlines that occurred or would occur during the period from October 7, 2023, through October 7, 2024. As a result, affected individuals and businesses would have until October 7, 2024, to file returns and pay any taxes that were originally due during this period. This extension includes filing for most returns, including:

• individuals who had a valid extension to file their 2022 return due to run out on October 16, 2023. However, because tax payments related to these 2022 returns were due on April 18, 2023, those payments were not eligible for this relief. So, these individuals filing on extension have more time to file, but not to pay;
• calendar-year corporations whose 2022 extensions run out on October 16, 2023. Similarly, these corporations have more time to file, but not to pay;
• 2023 individual and business returns and payments normally due on March 15 and April 15, 2024. These individuals and businesses have both more time to file and more time to pay;
• quarterly estimated income tax payments normally due on January 16, April 15, June 17 and September 16, 2024;
• quarterly payroll and excise tax returns normally due on October 31, 2023, and January 31, April 30 and July 31, 2024;
• calendar-year tax-exempt organizations whose extensions run out on November 15, 2023; and
• retirement plan contributions and rollovers.

The penalty for failure to make payroll and excise tax deposits due on or after October 7, 2023 and before November 6, 2023, would be abated. But the deposits must be made by November 6, 2023.

Notice 2023-71

IR-2023-188

The Internal Revenue Service could release as soon as today the process that businesses can use to withdraw employee retention credit claims.

The Internal Revenue Service could release as soon as today the process that businesses can use to withdraw employee retention credit claims.

The move comes in the wake of the agency announcing that it is halting the processing of new ERC claims until at least the beginning of 2024 and scrutinizing existing claims due to the prevalence of suspected fraudulent claims following a spike in claims in 2023 coupled with the saturation marketing by so-called ERC mills. Thus far, the IRS closer examination of claims has led to thousands already being submitted for auditing.

As part of the heightened scrutiny of claims, the IRS said it would create a process by which businesses would have the ability to withdraw claims before they are processed if they do a more thorough review and determine the claim is not actually a valid claim for the credit that was created as part of the CARES Act to help businesses that may have lost income retain employees during the COVID-19 pandemic.

"I learned this morning that there is going to be an announcement tomorrow [October 19, 2023] on the withdrawal process initiative that the Service is going to be initiating," Linda Azmon, special counsel at the IRS’s Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division, said October 18, 2023, during a session of the American Bar Association’s Virtual 2023 Fall Tax Meeting.

Azmon said that "taxpayers who have not received their claims for refund will be entitled to participate in this process," adding that there is "going to be specific procedures that taxpayers can follow to request their withdrawal of their claims for refund."

She did not provide any specific information on what the process entails, but noted that requesting a withdrawal "means that a taxpayer is requesting that the amended return not be processed at all. And it’s going to be required that the complete return be withdrawn." This is limited to taxpayers who have not had their claim processed, have not received their check or who have the check but have not yet cashed it.

One of the reasons a taxpayer may want to withdraw a claim is "taxpayers have been advised that the only way the Service can recapture claims for refund is through the erroneous refund procedures," she said. "That usually means the service asks for the funds back and if they don’t receive it, the Service asks [the] Department of Justice to bring suit within two years of the payment."

But Azmon points out that taxpayers being told this are being given information that is not entirely correct, as the agency has issued final regulations that allow the IRS to treat an erroneous refund as an underpayment of tax subject to the regular assessment and administrative collections procedures.

"This is a way for the service to recover funds that a taxpayer should have received in an efficient way without the cost of litigation," she said. "And it still provides the administrative processing rights for taxpayers to dispute their claims" without the cost of litigation.

By Gregory Twachtman, Washington News Editor

The Internal Revenue Service detailed how it is proceeding with a pilot program that will allow taxpayers to file their taxes directly on the IRS website as an option along with doing an electronic file or working through a tax professional or other third-party tax preparer.

The IRS released substantial new guidance regarding the new clean vehicle credit and the used clean vehicle credit. The guidance updates procedures for manufacturer, dealer and seller registrations and written reports; and provides detailed rules for a taxpayer’s election to transfer a credit to the dealer after 2023. The guidance includes:

The IRS released substantial new guidance regarding the new clean vehicle credit and the used clean vehicle credit. The guidance updates procedures for manufacturer, dealer and seller registrations and written reports; and provides detailed rules for a taxpayer’s election to transfer a credit to the dealer after 2023. The guidance includes:

• -- Rev. Proc. 2023-33, which is scheduled to be published on October 23, 2023, in I.R.B. 2023-43;
• -- NPRM REG-113064-23, which is scheduled to published in the Federal Register on October 10, 2023; and
• -- IRS Fact Sheet FS-2023-22, which updates the IRS Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) for the clean vehicle credits.

The proposed regs are generally proposed to apply to tax years beginning after they are published in the Federal Register. However, the proposed regs for transferring credits to dealers are proposed to apply beginning on January 1, 2024, which is when the transfer election becomes available. Proposed regs for treating the omission of a correct vehicle identification number (VIN) as a mathematical or clerical error would also apply to the Code Sec. 45W clean commercial vehicle credit. They are proposed to apply to tax years beginning after December 31, 2023.

Comments are requested. Rev. Proc. 2022-42 is superseded in part.

Proposed Regs for the Clean Vehicle Credits

For purposes of the new clean vehicle credit, the used clean vehicle credit, and the commercial clean vehicle credit, the proposed regs would treat a taxpayer as having omitted the required correct vehicle identification number (VIN) for the vehicle if the VIN is missing from the taxpayer’s return or the number reported on the return is an invalid VIN. An invalid VIN is a number that does not match any existing VIN reported by a qualified manufacturer. A taxpayer would also be treated as omitting the VIN if the provided VIN is not for a qualified vehicle for the year the credit is claimed.

With respect to the new clean vehicle credit and the used clean vehicle credit, the proposed regs would clarify that taxpayer must file an income tax return for the year the clean vehicle is placed in service, including a Form 8936, Clean Vehicle Credits. The taxpayer is treated as having omitted the vehicle’s correct VIN if the VIN on the taxpayer’s return does not match the VIN in the seller’s report. In addition, a dealer under the proposed regs would not include persons licensed solely by a U.S. territory. To facilitate direct-to-consumer sales, a dealer generally could make sales outside the jurisdiction where it is licensed; however, it could not make sales at sites outside its own jurisdiction.

New Rules for Used Clean Vehicle Credit

The proposed regs would clarify that a vehicle’s eligibility for the used vehicle credit is not affected by a title that indicates it has been damaged or an otherwise a branded title. In addition, the used vehicle credit could not be divided among multiple owners of a single vehicle. With respect to the MAGI limit for eligible taxpayers, if the taxpayer's filing status for the tax year differs from the taxpayer's filing status in the preceding tax year, the taxpayer would satisfy the limit if MAGI does not exceed the threshold amount in either year based on the applicable filing status for that tax year. These last two rules are consistent with earlier proposed regs for the new clean vehicle credit.

The proposed regs would provide a first transfer rule, under which a qualified sale must be the first transfer of the previously-owned clean vehicle since August 16, 2022, as shown by the vehicle history of such vehicle, after the sale to the original owner. The rule would ignore transfers between dealers. The taxpayer generally could rely on the dealer’s representation of the vehicle history; however, taxpayers would also be encouraged to independently examine the vehicle history to confirm whether the first transfer rule is satisfied.

Under the proposed regs, a used vehicle’s sale price would include delivery charges, as well as fees and charges imposed by the dealer. The sale price it would not include separately-stated taxes and fees required by law, separate financing, extended warranties, insurance or maintenance service charges.

Cancellation of Sale, Return of Clean Vehicle, and Resale of Clean Vehicle

The proposed regs would clarify that a taxpayer cannot claim a clean vehicle credit if the sale is canceled before the taxpayer places th vehicle in service (that is, before the taxpayer takes delivery). The credits also would not be available if the taxpayer returns the vehicle within 30 days after placing it in service. A returned new clean vehicle would no longer qualify as a new clean vehicle. However, a returned used clean vehicle could continue to qualify for the credit if the vehicle history does not reflect the sale and return. A vehicle’s return would nullify any election the taxpayer made to transfer the credit for the vehicle.

Under the proposed regs, a taxpayer acquires a clean vehicle for resale if the resale occurs withing 30 days after the taxpayer places the vehicle in service. The resold vehicle would not qualify for either credit. If the taxpayer elected to transfer the credit, the election remains valid after the resale; thus, the credit is recaptured from the taxpayer, not from the dealer.

Taxpayers returning or reselling a clean vehicle more than 30 days after the date the taxpayer placed it in service would generally remain eligible for the applicable clean vehicle credit for purchasing the vehicle. Any election to transfer the taxpayer’s credit to the dealer also remains in effect. The returned or resold vehicle would not remain eligible for either credit. However, the IRS could disallow the credit if, based on the facts and circumstances, it determines that the taxpayer purchased the vehicle with the intent to resell or return it

Taxpayer's Election to Transfer Clean Vehicle Credit to Dealer

A taxpayer that elects to transfer a credit to a registered dealer must transfer the entire amount of the allowable credit. Each taxpayer may transfer a total of two credits per year (either two new clean vehicle credits, or one new clean vehicle credit and one used clean vehicle credit). This is the case even if married taxpayers file a joint return. A transfer election is irrevocable.

Under the proposed regs, the amount of a clean vehicle credit an electing taxpayer could transfer could exceed the electing taxpayer’s regular tax liability; and the amount of a transferred credit would not be subject to recapture merely because it exceeds the taxpayer’s tax liability. The dealer’s payment for the transferred credit, whether in cash or as a partial payment or down payment for the vehicle, is not includible in the electing taxpayer’s gross income. To ensure that the credit properly reduces the taxpayer’s basis in the vehicle, the electing taxpayer is treated as repaying the payment to the dealer as part of the purchase price of the vehicle.

Both the electing taxpayer and the dealer must make detailed disclosures and attestations. Some of these disclosures must be made to the other party, and some must be made through the IRS Energy Credits Online Portal. All must be made no later than the time of the sale. A taxpayer cannot transfer any portion of the new clean vehicle credit that is treated as part of the general business credit.

A seller or a registered dealer must retain records of transferred credits for at least three years after the taxpayer makes the credit transfer election or a seller files its report for the sale.

Manufacturer, Dealer and Seller Registration and Report Requirements

Clean vehicle manufacturers, sellers and dealers must register through an IRS Energy Credits Online Portal that should be available on the IRS website later this month. A representative of the manufacturer, seller or dealer will have to create or sign into an account on irs.gov. Registration help is available at www.irs.gov/registerhelp. Manufacturers, sellers and dealers may check IRS.gov/cleanvehicles for updates.

Taxpayers and sellers may rely on information and certifications by a qualified manufacturer providing that a vehicle is eligible for the new clean vehicle credit or the used clean vehicle credit. However, this reliance is limited to information regarding the vehicle’s eligibility for the applicable credit.

Rev. Proc. 2023-33 details the required registration information for sellers and dealers. The IRS will confirm the information or notify the seller or dealer that it has been unable to do so. If the IRS accepts a dealer registration, it will issue a unique dealer identification number. If the IRS rejects the registration, the dealer may request administrative review.

s for a qualified manufacturer’s written agreement with and a dealer’s written reports to the IRS before January 1, 2024, manufacturers and sellers may still use the procedures described in Rev. Proc. 2022-42. However, as of January 1, 2024, qualified manufacturers must have entered into written agreements with the IRS via the IRS Energy Credits Online Portal, even if they previously registered and filed written agreements under Rev. Proc. 2022-42. Also as of January 1, 2024, qualified manufacturers and sellers must use the Portal to file their required reports to the IRS.

A seller must file its report within three calendar days of the sale, and provide a copy to the taxpayer within another three days. If the information in the report does not match information in IRS records, the IRS may reject the report and notify the seller. The seller must notify the buyer within three calendar days. If the IRS rejects a seller report, a dealer will not be eligible for advance credit payments. A seller must also use the Portal to update or rescind information for a scrivener’s error or the cancellation of a sale as promptly as possible (the seller must also file a new report noting the return of a vehicle). The seller must notify the buyer within three calendar days and provide a copy of the updated or rescinded report.

Advance Credit Payments to Dealers

When a buyer elects to transfer a clean vehicle credit to a dealer, the advance credit program allows the dealer to receive payment of the credit before the dealer files its tax return. The proposed regs would clarify that the advance payments are not included in the dealer’s income and they may exceed the dealer’s tax liability. The dealer cannot deduct the payment made to the electing taxpayer. The advance payment is included in the amount realized by the dealer on the sale of the clean vehicle. If the dealer is a partnership or an S corporation, the advance payment is not treated as exempt income.

To receive advance credit payments, the registered dealer must be an eligible entity under the proposed regs. An eligible entity is a registered dealer that submits additional registration information and is in dealer tax compliance. The IRS will conduct dealer tax compliance checks before disbursing an advance credit payment, and also on a continuing and regular basis.

Dealer tax compliance means that, for all tax periods during the most recent five tax years, the dealer has filed all of its required federal information and tax returns, including for federal income and employment tax; and paid all federal tax, penalties, and interest due at the time of sale (or is current on its obligations under any installment agreement with the IRS). The dealer must also retain information related to the vehicle sale or credit transfer for at least three years. A dealer that does not satisfy this test may still be a registered dealer, but it cannot be an eligible entity until the tax compliance issue is resolved.

The dealer that receives the transferred credit must provide the qualified vehicle’s VIN, the seller report, and the required taxpayer disclosure information through the IRS Energy Credits Online Portal. The IRS will disburse advance payments of the credits only through electronic payments; it will not issue any paper checks.

The IRS may suspend a registered dealer’s eligibility to participate in the advance payment program for sever reasons, including the provision of inaccurate information regarding eligible for the credit; failure to satisfy dealer tax compliance requirements; and failure to properly use the IRS Energy Credits Online Portal. The IRS will notify the dealer of its suspension, and give the dealer an opportunity correct the errors. If a suspended dealer does not correct the errors withing one year, the IRS will revoke its registration.

The IRS may also revoke a dealer’s registration to receive transferred credits and its eligibility for the advance payment program for failure to comply with the registration or tax compliance requirements, for losing its dealer license, for providing inaccurate information, for failing to retain required records for three years, or if it is suspended three times in the preceding year. The IRS will notify the dealer within 30 days of its decision to revoke eligibility for the advance payment program, and the dealer may request administrative review of the decision. The dealer may re-register after one year, but will be permanently barred after three revocations.

The proposed regs would provide that a dealer could not administratively appeal the IRS’s decisions relating to the suspension or revocation of a dealer’s registration unless the IRS and the IRS Independent Office of Appeals agree that such review is available and the IRS provides the time and manner for the review.

Comments Requested

The IRS requests comments on the proposed regs. Comments and requests for a public hearing must be received by December 11, 2023. They may be mailed to the IRS, or submitted electronically via the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov (indicate IRS and REG-113064-23).

Effect on Other Documents

Rev. Proc. 2023-33 supersedes in part Rev. Proc. 2022-42, I.R.B. 2022-52 , 565.

Proposed Regulations, NPRM REG-113064-23

Rev. Proc. 2023-33

FS-2023-22

IR-2023-186

The IRS has released the 2023-2024 special per diem rates. Taxpayers use the per diem rates to substantiate certain expenses incurred while traveling away from home. These special per diem rates include:

The IRS has released the 2023-2024 special per diem rates. Taxpayers use the per diem rates to substantiate certain expenses incurred while traveling away from home. These special per diem rates include:

• 1. the special transportation industry meal and incidental expenses (M&IE) rates,
• 2. the rate for the incidental expenses only deduction,
• 3. and the rates and list of high-cost localities for purposes of the high-low substantiation method.

Transportation Industry Special Per Diem Rates

The special M&IE rates for taxpayers in the transportation industry are:

• $69 for any locality of travel in the continental United States (CONUS), and
• $74 for any locality of travel outside the continental United States (OCONUS).

Incidental Expenses Only Rate

The rate is $5 per day for any CONUS or OCONUS travel for the incidental expenses only deduction.

High-Low Substantiation Method

For purposes of the high-low substantiation method, the 2023-2024 special per diem rates are:

• $309 for travel to any high-cost locality, and
• $214 for travel to any other locality within CONUS.

The amount treated as paid for meals is:

• $74 for travel to any high-cost locality, and
• $64 for travel to any other locality within CONUS

Instead of the meal and incidental expenses only substantiation method, taxpayers may use:

• $74 for travel to any high-cost locality, and
• $64 for travel to any other locality within CONUS.

Taxpayers using the high-low method must comply with Rev. Proc. 2019-48, I.R.B. 2019-51, 1390. That procedure provides the rules for using a per diem rate to substantiate the amount of ordinary and necessary business expenses paid or incurred while traveling away from home.

The IRS provided guidance on the new energy efficient home credit, as amended by the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (P.L. 117-169). The guidance largely reiterates the statutory requirements for the credit, but it provides some new details regarding definitions, certifications and substantiation.

The IRS provided guidance on the new energy efficient home credit, as amended by the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (P.L. 117-169). The guidance largely reiterates the statutory requirements for the credit, but it provides some new details regarding definitions, certifications and substantiation.

Definitions

For purposes of the requirement that a home must be acquired from an eligible contractor, a home leased from the contractor for use as a residence is considered acquired from the contractor. However, a home the contractor retains for use as a residence is not acquired from the contractor. A manufactured home may be acquired directly from the contractor, or indirectly from an intermediary that acquired it from the contractor and then sold or leased it to a buyer for use as a residence, or to intervening intermediaries that eventually sold it to a buyer for use as a residence.

For a constructed home, the eligible contractor is the person that built and owned the home and had a basis in it during its construction. For a manufactured home, the eligible contractor is the person that produced the home and owned and had a basis in it during its production.

The United States includes only the states and the District of Columbia.

Certifications

A dwelling unit that is certified under the applicable Energy Star program is considered to meet the program requirements for purposes of the credit. Similarly, a dwelling unit that is certified under the Zero Energy Ready Home (ZERH) program is deemed to meet the requirements for the credit for a ZERH. The ZERH program in effect for purposes of the credit is the one in effect as of the date identified on the Department of Energy’s ZERH webpage at https://www.energy.gov/eere/buildings/doe-zero-energy-ready-home-zerh-program-requirements.

The eligible contractor must obtain the appropriate Energy Star or ZERH certification before claiming the credit. The contractor should keep the certification with its tax records, but does not have to file it with the return that claims the credit.

Rules for homes acquired before 2023, under which eligible certifiers could certify a home and contractors could use approved software to calculate a new home’s energy consumption, do not apply to a home acquired after 2022.

Substantiation

To substantiate the credit, the contractor must retain in its tax records, at a minimum, the home's Energy Star or ZERH certification, including its date; and records sufficient to establish:

1. the address of the qualified home and its location in the United States;
2. the taxpayer’s status as an eligible contractor;
3. the acquisition of the home from the taxpayer for use as a residence, including the name of the person who acquired it; and
4. if applicable, proof that the prevailing wage requirements were met.

However, for a manufactured home the contractor sells to a dealer, a safe harbor allows the contractor to rely on a statement by the dealer to establish the date the home was acquired, its location in the United States, and its acquisition for use as a residence. The statement must:

1. Specify the date of the retail sale of the manufactured home, state that the dealer delivered it to the purchaser at an address in the United States, and provide that the dealer has no knowledge of any information suggesting that the purchaser will use the manufactured home other than as a residence;
2. Provide the name, address and telephone number of the dealer and any intervening intermediaries; and
3. Declare, under penalties of perjury, that the dealer statement and any accompanying documents are true, correct and complete.

Effect on Other Documents

Notice 2008-35, 2008-1 CB 647, and Notice 2008-36, 2008-1 CB 650, are obsoleted for qualified homes acquired after December 31, 2022.

The IRS identified drought-stricken areas where tax relief is available to taxpayers that sold or exchanged livestock because of drought. The relief extends the deadlines for taxpayers to replace the livestock and avoid reporting gain on the sales. These extensions apply until the drought-stricken area has a drought-free year.

The IRS identified drought-stricken areas where tax relief is available to taxpayers that sold or exchanged livestock because of drought. The relief extends the deadlines for taxpayers to replace the livestock and avoid reporting gain on the sales. These extensions apply until the drought-stricken area has a drought-free year.

When Sales of Livestock are Involuntary Conversions

Sales of livestock due to drought are involuntary conversions of property. Taxpayers can postpone gain on involuntary conversions if they buy qualified replacement property during the replacement period. Qualified replacement property must be similar or related in service or use to the converted property.

Usually, the replacement period ends two years after the tax year in which the involuntary conversion occurs. However, a longer replacement period applies in several situations, such as when sales occur in a drought-stricken area.

Livestock Sold Because of Weather

Taxpayers have four years to replace livestock they sold or exchanged solely because of drought, flood, or other weather condition. Three conditions apply.

First, the livestock cannot be raised for slaughter, held for sporting purposes or be poultry.

Second, the taxpayer must have held the converted livestock for:

• draft,
• dairy, or
• breeeding purposes.

Third, the weather condition must make the area eligible for federal assistance.

Persistent Drought

The IRS extends the four-year replacement period when a taxpayer sells or exchanges livestock due to persistent drought. The extension continues until the taxpayer’s region experiences a drought-free year.

The first drought-free year is the first 12-month period that:

• ends on August 31 in or after the last year of the four-year replacement period, and
• does not include any weekly period of drought.

What Areas are Suffering from Drought

The National Drought Mitigation Center produces weekly Drought Monitor maps that report drought-stricken areas. Taxpayers can view these maps at

http://droughtmonitor.unl.edu/Maps/MapArchive.aspx

However, the IRS also provided a list of areas where the year ending on August 31, 2023, was not a drought-free year. The replacement period in these areas will continue until the area has a drought-free year.

With the Internal Revenue Service announcing more details on how it will be targeting America’s wealthiest taxpayers, Kostelanetz’s Megan Brackney offered up some advice on preparing for increased compliance activity.

With the Internal Revenue Service announcing more details on how it will be targeting America’s wealthiest taxpayers, Kostelanetz’s Megan Brackney offered up some advice on preparing for increased compliance activity.

The first step, especially for those that fall within the agency’s announced parameters for who is being targeted, is to review recent tax filings. The agency announced in September it would be targeting large partnerships.

"I would say to look back over the last three years because that’s the typical statute of limitations period for the IRS to audit and assess, maybe look back even a little bit longer," Brackney, partner at the law firm, said in an interview.

In particular, she recommended a focus on major financial transactions.

"Look at significant transactions and make sure that you have all the substantiation because a lot of times, the issue isn’t so much a legal question or anything to complex," she continued. "It’s just whether or not you know [for example if] the partnership sold an asset, do they actually have records that substantiate their basis?"

Brackney expects that after the agency completes its work on the largest partnerships, it will continue this kind of compliance work on those high earning partnerships that may be outside of the original targeted thresholds.

Other things to start thinking about if you are a large partnership is how you plan to respond to an audit if you end up targeted for enforcement action by the IRS, especially if you have significant transactions that might draw extra scrutiny. Some questions to ponder are whether you have the in-house expertise to handle an audit or if you plan on going to an outside source.

"Nobody is going to do those things until they are actually audited, but its good to start thinking about it and planning it," she said. "And if you do have a really significant transaction, maybe go ahead and have someone take a look at it already to make sure it is properly documented."

She also suggested that if a partnership finds an error as they look back on their own to go ahead and correct it with the IRS before the agency "is poking around and looking at it."

Training Concerns

And while the IRS is moving forward with its plans to audit high earning partnerships, Brackney expressed some concerns relative to agent training.

She recalled a few years ago when the IRS announced global high net worth audits program that ended up collecting very little.

"Most of those audits resulted in no change letters," Brackney said, "which is wild because you audit a normal middle-class taxpayer with a Schedule C business, you are going to have a change [and] not because anybody is trying to cheat. There is going to be something that they can’t substantiate."

She said it was hard to understand how most of the global high net worth audits had no changes, and expressed some concerns that this could happen again, but is hopeful that with the agency’s supplemental funding from the Inflation Reduction Act will come proper training to handle the complexities of reviewing these tax returns.

"I support the IRS being fully funded," she said. "It’s good for tax administration and it makes a fairer society because it’s not like people are just getting away with stuff because the IRS doesn’t have the resources."

By Gregory Twachtman, Washington News Editor

The IRS has cautioned taxpayers to be vigilant about promotions involving exaggerated art donation deductions that may target high-income individuals and has also provided valuable tips to help people steer clear of falling into such schemes. Taxpayers can legitimately claim art donations, but dishonest promoters may employ direct solicitation to make unrealistically promising offers. In a bid to boost compliance and protect taxpayers from scams, the IRS has active promoter investigations and taxpayer audits underway in this area.

The IRS has cautioned taxpayers to be vigilant about promotions involving exaggerated art donation deductions that may target high-income individuals and has also provided valuable tips to help people steer clear of falling into such schemes. Taxpayers can legitimately claim art donations, but dishonest promoters may employ direct solicitation to make unrealistically promising offers. In a bid to boost compliance and protect taxpayers from scams, the IRS has active promoter investigations and taxpayer audits underway in this area.

Also, the IRS has employed various compliance tools, including tax return audits and civil penalty investigations, to combat abusive art donations. Taxpayers, especially high-income individuals, are advised to watch out for aggressive promotions. Additionally, following Inflation Reduction Act funding the IRS has intensified the efforts to ensure accurate tax payments from high-income and high-wealth individuals.

The Service has advised taxpayers to watch-out for the following red flags:

• Be wary of purchasing multiple works by the same artist with little market value beyond what promoters claim.
• Watch for specific appraisers arranged by promoters, as their appraisals often lack crucial details.
• Taxpayers are responsible for accurate tax reporting, and engaging in tax avoidance schemes can lead to penalties, interest, fines, and even imprisonment.
• Charities should also be cautious not to inadvertently support these schemes.

In order to to properly claim a charitable contribution deduction for an art donation, a taxpayer must keep records to prove:

• Name and address of the charitable organization that received the art.
• Date and location of the contribution.
• Detailed description of the donated art.

Also, The IRS has a team of trained appraisers in Art Appraisal Services who provide assistance and advice to the IRS and taxpayers on valuation questions in connection with personal property and works of art.

Finally, the taxpayers can report tax-related illegal activities relating to charitable contributions of art using:

• Form 14242, Report Suspected Abusive Tax Promotions or Preparers, to report a suspected abusive tax avoidance scheme and tax return preparers who promote such schemes.
• They should also report fraud to the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration at 800-366-4484.

The American Institute of CPAs (AICPA) has urged the IRS and Treasury in an August 12 letter to issue guidance on President Trump’s payroll tax deferral memorandum. The executive action signed by the president on August 8 instructs Treasury to defer the collection and payment of payroll taxes from September 1 through years-end for eligible employees.

The American Institute of CPAs (AICPA) has urged the IRS and Treasury in an August 12 letter to issue guidance on President Trump’s payroll tax deferral memorandum. The executive action signed by the president on August 8 instructs Treasury to defer the collection and payment of payroll taxes from September 1 through years-end for eligible employees.

The presidential memorandum to defer payroll taxes has "caused confusion and concern among accountants and businesses," according to the AICPA. Thus, in its letter released on August 13, the AICPA asks IRS Commissioner Charles "Chuck" Rettig and Assistant Treasury Secretary David Kautter to issue guidance on a number of related issues, including the following items:

• Guidance stating that the deferral is voluntary and that an "eligible employee" is responsible for making an affirmative election to defer the payroll taxes;
• Guidance stating that an "eligible employee" is an employee whose wages are less than $4,000 per bi-weekly pay period;
• Guidance stating that the $4,000 limit should apply separately to each employer of an employee; and
• Guidance stating a payment due date(s) for the deferred taxes and a mechanism for employees to pay the deferred taxes.

Payroll Tax Forgiveness

Notably, Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin indicated earlier this week that participation in the deferral of payroll taxes is not mandatory. "We cannot force people to participate," Mnuchin said in a televised interview. "But I think many small businesses will do this and pass on the benefits." Additionally, Mnuchin alluded that Trump intends to make the deferral a cut if reelected, essentially forgiving the deferred taxes.

To that end, White House economic advisor Larry Kudlow attempted to clarify Trump’s position that the payroll tax deferral should be forgiven rather than delayed. And when Trump talks about "terminating the payroll tax", he is only referring to those taxes specified within the presidential memorandum, not the entire payroll tax as a whole, according to Kudlow.

"I just want to be clear that the president is saying that he will provide forgiveness; he will terminate the deferral on a forgiveness basis," Kudlow told reporters at the White House on August 13. "That is what he is saying just to be clear…there was some confusion about that."

Additionally, Kudlow told reporters that the payroll tax deferral would apply to the self-employed. Although the applicable presidential memorandum is not currently written as such, Kudlow added that the administration "will make a technical change to it."

The IRS has released final regulations that address the interaction of the $10,000/$5,000 cap on the state and local tax (SALT) deduction and charitable contributions. The regulations include:

• a safe harbor for individuals who have any portion of a charitable deduction disallowed due to the receipt of SALT benefits;
• a safe harbor for business entities to deduct certain payments made to a charitable organization in exchange for SALT benefits; and
• application of the quid pro quo principle under Code Sec. 170 to benefits received or expected to be received by the donor from a third party.

The IRS has released final regulations that address the interaction of the $10,000/$5,000 cap on the state and local tax (SALT) deduction and charitable contributions. The regulations include:

• a safe harbor for individuals who have any portion of a charitable deduction disallowed due to the receipt of SALT benefits;
• a safe harbor for business entities to deduct certain payments made to a charitable organization in exchange for SALT benefits; and
• application of the quid pro quo principle under Code Sec. 170 to benefits received or expected to be received by the donor from a third party.

The final rules generally adopt the proposed regulations issued in December 2019 ( NPRM REG-107431-19) with minor clarifications.

SALT Limit

An individual’s itemized deduction of SALT taxes is limited to $10,000 ($5,000 if married filing separately) for tax years beginning after 2017. Some states and local governments adopted laws that allowed individuals to receive a state tax credit for contributions to certain charitable funds. These laws are aimed at getting around the SALT deduction limit by creating a charitable deduction for federal income tax purposes.

Under previously issued regulations, the receipt of a SALT credit for a charitable contribution is the receipt of a return benefit (quid pro quo benefit). Thus, the taxpayer must reduce any contribution deduction by the amount of any SALT credit received or expected to receive in return. A de minimis exception is available if the SALT credit does not exceed 15 percent of the taxpayer’s charitable payment.

A taxpayer is not required to reduce the charitable contribution deduction because of the receipt of SALT deductions. However, the taxpayer must reduce the charitable deduction if it receives or expects to receive SALT deductions in excess of the taxpayer’s payment or the fair market value of property transferred.

Payments by Individuals

The final regulations adopt the safe harbor for individuals whose have a portion of a charitable deduction disallowed due to the receipt of a SALT credit. Any disallowed portion of the charitable contribution deduction may be treated as the payment of SALT taxes for the purposes of deducting taxes under Code Sec. 164. The safe harbor is allowed in the tax year the charitable payment is made, but only to the extent that the SALT credit is applied as provided under state or local law to offset the individual’s SALT liability for the current or preceding tax year. Any unused credit may be carried forward as provided under state and local law.

The final regulations are not intended to permit a taxpayer to avoid the SALT deduction cap. Thus, any payment treated as a state or local tax under Code Sec. 164 is subject to the limit. Also, a taxpayer is not permitted to deduct the same under more than one rule, so a taxpayer who relies on this safe harbor to deduction payments as SALT taxes may also not deduct the same payment under any other Code provision.

Payments by Business Entities

The final regulations adopt the safe harbor that business entities may continue to deduct charitable contributions in exchange a SALT credit. A business entity may deduct the payments as an ordinary and necessary business expenses under Code Sec. 162 if made for a business purpose.

If a C corporation or specified passthrough entity makes the charitable payment in exchange for a SALT credit, it may deduct the payment as a business expense to the extent of any SALT credit received or expected to be received. In addition, if the charitable payment bears a direct relationship to the taxpayer’s business, then it may be deducted as a business expense rather than a charitable contribution regardless of whether the taxpayer receives or expects to receive a SALT credit.

The safe harbor for C corporations and specified passthrough entities applies only to payments of cash and cash equivalents. The safe harbor for specified passthrough entities does not apply if the credit received or expected to be received reduces a state or local income tax.

Benefits from Third Party

If a taxpayer receives any goods, services, or other benefits from a charitable organization in consideration for a contribution, then the charitable deduction must be reduced by the value of those benefits. If the contribution exceeds the fair market value of the benefits received, then only the excess is a deductible as a charitable contribution.

The final regulations continue to provide that this quid pro quo principal applies regardless of whether the party providing the goods, services, or other benefits is the charitable organization or not. A taxpayer will be treated as receiving goods and services in consideration for the taxpayer’s charitable contribution if, at the time the taxpayer makes the payment or transfer, the taxpayer receives or expects to receive goods or services in return. The final rules clarify that the quid pro quo principle applies regardless of whether the party providing the quid pro quo is the donee or a third party.

The IRS has provided guidance on the special rules relating to funding of single-employer defined benefit pension plans, and related benefit limitations, under Act Sec. 3608 of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act) (P.L. 116-136). The guidance clarifies application of the extended contribution deadline, and the optional use of the prior year’s adjusted funding target attainment percentage (AFTAP), with examples.

The IRS has provided guidance on the special rules relating to funding of single-employer defined benefit pension plans, and related benefit limitations, under Act Sec. 3608 of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act) (P.L. 116-136). The guidance clarifies application of the extended contribution deadline, and the optional use of the prior year’s adjusted funding target attainment percentage (AFTAP), with examples.

Affected Funding Rules

A single-employer defined benefit plan is subject to minimum required contribution rules under Code Sec. 430. The minimum required contribution for a plan year generally depends on a comparison of the value of plan assets (reduced by any credit balances) with the plan's funding target. If the value of plan assets is less than the funding target of the plan for the year, the minimum required contribution for that plan year is the sum of:

• the target normal cost for the plan year;
• the shortfall amortization installments for the plan year; and
• the waiver amortization installments for the plan year.

The minimum required contribution for a plan year must be paid within 8-1/2 months after the close of the plan year ( Code Sec. 430(j)). Payments made on a date other than the valuation date for the plan year must be adjusted for interest accruing for the period from the valuation date to the payment date, at the effective interest rate for the plan for the year. Employers maintaining plans that had a funding shortfall for the preceding plan year (i.e., the value of plan assets, reduced by credit balances, was less than the funding target for the preceding year) must make quarterly contributions to the plan. If the employer fails to pay the full amount of a required quarterly installment, interest is assessed at the plan's effective interest rate plus five percentage points.

Benefit limits apply to plans that have funded target attainment percentage for the preceding year below designated thresholds are deemed to be in "at-risk" status and are subject to increased target liability. The benefit limits on single-employer defined benefit plans are based on the plan’s AFTAP ( Code Sec. 436(b)). Generally, a plan's funding target attainment percentage is the ratio of the value of plan assets for the plan year (reduced by any funding standard carryover balance and prefunding balance) to the funding target for the plan year (determined without regard to the plan's at-risk status) ( Code Secs. 430(d)(2) and 436(j)(1)).

CARES Act Relief
Minimum required contributions to a single-employer retirement plan otherwise due in calendar year 2020 (including any quarterly contributions) are delayed until January 1, 2021. The amount of each such contribution is increased by any interest accruing for the period between the original due date (without regard to the delay) for the contribution and the payment date. A plan sponsor also may elect to treat the plan’s AFTAP for the last plan year ending before January 1, 2020, as the AFTAP for plan years that include calendar year 2020 (Act Sec. 3608 of P.L. 116-136.

Extended Deadline and Interest
The extended contribution due date of January 1, 2021, does not apply to a multiemployer plan, a CSEC plan, a fully-insured plan, or a money purchase pension plan. If the contribution deadline for a plan year is during 2020, a contribution in excess of the amount needed to satisfy the minimum required contribution for the plan year that is made by January 1, 2021, may be designated as a contribution for that plan year.

Any payment made after the original due date for the contribution and by the extended due date must be increased for the period between the original due date and the payment date at the effective interest rate for the plan year that includes the payment date. If the contribution is less than the amount that was due on the original due date for the minimum required contribution, as increased with interest pursuant to the CARES Act, then a portion of the minimum required contribution for that plan year would remain unpaid. The unpaid portion of the minimum required contribution, determined as of the valuation date and based on contributions made on or before January 1, 2021, with the contributions discounted for interest to the valuation date, would give rise to an unpaid minimum required contribution that would be subject to an excise tax. Furthermore, a contribution made after January 1, 2021, to satisfy that unpaid minimum required contribution must be adjusted for interest for the period between the date that the contribution is made and the valuation date at the effective interest rate for the plan year for which the contribution is made (with additional interest as required to reflect any late quarterly installments for the plan year).

The CARES Act specifies that to determine the amount of a quarterly installment due by the extended due date, the amount of that installment is increased from the installment’s original due date to the payment date at the effective interest rate for the plan year that includes the date the quarterly installment is paid. If a plan sponsor does not satisfy a quarterly installment originally due during 2020 by the extended due date, then the unpaid portion of that installment is subject to a higher interest rate for the period during which the installment (or a portion thereof) remains unpaid when determining the amount of the minimum required contribution that is satisfied by a contribution.

A contribution made after the original due date for a plan year but on or before the extended due date is taken into account as of a valuation date for a plan year after the plan year for which the contribution was made. For purposes of determining the value of plan assets, if an employer makes a contribution to the plan after the valuation date for the current plan year and the contribution is for an earlier plan year, then the present value of the contribution determined as of that valuation date is taken into account as an asset of the plan as of the valuation date, provided the contribution is made before a specified deadline. The specified deadline is the deadline for contributions for the plan year immediately preceding the current plan year. However, that deadline is extended by the CARES Act. Furthermore, the interest adjustment rules override the discounting rules that apply generally for this purpose. Note, however, that certification of the AFTAP for a plan year must not take into account contributions that are expected to be made after the certification date.

If the plan year is a plan year for which the extended due date for minimum required contributions applies, then the deadline for a plan sponsor’s election to increase a prefunding balance or to use a prefunding balance or a funding standard carryover balance to offset the minimum required contribution for that plan year is extended to January 1, 2021. However, the extended due date does not change the date by which a contribution must be made in order to be deducted for a tax year. A taxpayer is deemed to have made a payment on the last day of the preceding tax year if the payment is on account of that tax year and is made no later than the time prescribed by law for filing the return for that tax year (including extensions).

Guidance for AFTAP Election

A plan sponsor may elect to apply the AFTAP for the last plan year ending before January 1, 2020, for a plan year that includes any portion of calendar year 2020. For example, if a plan sponsor makes an election for a plan year that runs from July 1, 2019, to June 30, 2020, then the AFTAP that applies is the certified AFTAP from the plan year that ends on June 30, 2019. That plan sponsor may separately elect to use that same AFTAP for the plan year that begins on July 1, 2020.

The AFTAP election must be made using the procedures that apply for elections relating to funding balances. Thus, the plan sponsor must provide written notification of the election to the plan's actuary and the plan administrator. If a plan’s actuary has not certified the plan’s AFTAP for a plan year before the plan sponsor makes the election, then the plan sponsor’s election is treated as a certification of the AFTAP. Thus, beginning with the date of the election, the AFTAP for the last plan year ending on or before December 31, 2019, applies for the plan year for which the election is made, rather than any presumed AFTAP.

A plan’s actuary generally must certify the plan’s AFTAP for a plan year for which the plan sponsor makes the election. However, if the plan sponsor makes the election for a plan year that begins in 2019 and ends in 2020 and also makes an election for the next plan year, then the actuary is not required to certify the plan’s AFTAP for the plan year that begins in 2019. If the plan’s actuary has certified an AFTAP for a plan year, then the Schedule SB of Form 5500, Annual Return/Report of Employee Benefit Plan, for that plan year should reflect the certified AFTAP.

If a plan’s actuary certified the plan’s AFTAP for a plan year before the plan sponsor makes the election, then the plan sponsor’s election is treated as a subsequent determination of the AFTAP for that plan year. However, the plan sponsor’s election is eligible for deemed immaterial treatment, and the election is treated as the recertification on the part of the actuary that is otherwise required for deemed immaterial treatment. Thus, the AFTAP that applies pursuant to the plan sponsor’s election is applied on a prospective basis beginning with the election date.

If the AFTAP that applies is pursuant to a plan sponsor’s election, then the restriction on plan amendments and unpredictable contingent event benefits is applied, except that the AFTAP that applies pursuant to the election is substituted for the presumed AFTAP. Thus, for example, the AFTAP that applies pursuant to the plan sponsor’s election will be used to calculate a presumed adjusted funding target and an inclusive presumed AFTAP.

The AFTAP that applies pursuant to a plan sponsor’s election for a plan year generally will not apply for purposes of the presumptions used in a subsequent plan year. Instead, the actual AFTAP for the plan year that was certified by the plan’s actuary generally is used for purposes of applying the presumption rules the subsequent plan year.

The IRS has reminded taxpayers that the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act ( P.L. 116-136) can provide favorable tax treatment for withdrawals from retirement plans and Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs). Under the CARES Act, individuals eligible for coronavirus-related relief may be able to withdraw up to $100,000 from IRAs or workplace retirement plans before December 31, 2020, if their plans allow. In addition to IRAs, this relief applies to 401(k) plans, 403(b) plans, profit-sharing plans and others.

The IRS has reminded taxpayers that the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act ( P.L. 116-136) can provide favorable tax treatment for withdrawals from retirement plans and Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs). Under the CARES Act, individuals eligible for coronavirus-related relief may be able to withdraw up to $100,000 from IRAs or workplace retirement plans before December 31, 2020, if their plans allow. In addition to IRAs, this relief applies to 401(k) plans, 403(b) plans, profit-sharing plans and others.

Also, until September 22, 2020, individuals eligible to take coronavirus-related withdrawals may be able to borrow as much as $100,000 (up from $50,000) from a workplace retirement plan, if their plan allows. Loans are not available from an IRA. For eligible individuals, plan administrators can suspend, for up to one year, plan loan repayments due on or after March 27, 2020, and before January 1, 2021. A suspended loan is subject to interest during the suspension period, and the term of the loan may be extended to account for the suspension period.

To be eligible for COVID-19 relief, coronavirus-related withdrawals or loans can only be made to an individual if:

• the individual is diagnosed with COVID-19 by a test approved by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (including a test authorized under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetics Act);
• the individual’s spouse or dependent is diagnosed with COVID-19 by such a test; or
• the individual, their spouse, or a member of the individual’s household experiences adverse financial consequences from: (1) being quarantined, furloughed or laid off, having work hours reduced, being unable to work due to lack of childcare, having a reduction in pay (or self-employment income), or having a job offer rescinded or start date for a job delayed, due to COVID-19; or (2) closing or reducing hours of a business owned or operated by the individual, the individual’s spouse, or a member of the individual’s household, due to COVID-19.

Taxpayers can learn more about these provisions in IRS Notice 2020-50, I.R.B. 2020-28, 35. The IRS has also posted FAQs that provide additional information.

The Treasury and IRS have issued final and proposed regulations under the global intangible low-taxed income (GILTI) and subpart F provisions for the treatment of high-taxed income. The final regulations provide guidance on determining the type of high-taxed income that is eligible for the exclusion (the "GILTI high-tax exclusion" or GILTI HTE).

The Treasury and IRS have issued final and proposed regulations under the global intangible low-taxed income (GILTI) and subpart F provisions for the treatment of high-taxed income. The final regulations provide guidance on determining the type of high-taxed income that is eligible for the exclusion (the "GILTI high-tax exclusion" or GILTI HTE).

Proposed regulations generally conform the rules for the subpart F high-tax exception to the rules for the GILTI high-tax exclusion. A single election is provided under Code Sec. 954(b)(4) for purposes of subpart F and tested income.

Under the Code Sec. 954(b)(4) high tax exception, income received by a controlled foreign corporation (CFC) is excluded under subpart F, if the income is subject to an effective rate of foreign tax that is greater than 90 percent of the maximum U.S. corporate tax rate.

Final Regulations on the GILTI HTE

The final regulations:

• provide that the GILTI HTE applies, on an elective basis, to high-taxed income of a CFC that is excluded from foreign base company (FBCI) ( Code Sec. 954) or insurance income ( Code Sec. 953) under Code Sec. 954(b)(4), regardless if the income would otherwise be FBCI or insurance income;
• provide that the effective foreign tax rate is determined on a tested unit basis;
• provide rules to determine the net amount of income (i.e., tentative tested income) and the foreign taxes paid or accrued with respect to such net amount of income that are used to compute the effective rate of tax;
• indicate how to make a GILTI HTE election; and
• do not provide rules that account for the use of foreign tax NOL carryforwards.

An exception under Code Sec. 954(b)(4) for purposes of the GILTI HTE applies to any item of income that is subject to an effective rate of tax greater than the maximum U.S. corporate tax rate, which is 18.9 percent based on a 21 percent tax. Controlling domestic shareholders of CFCs can elect to apply the exception to items of income that would not otherwise be FBCI or insurance income. An item of gross income is subject to a high-rate of foreign tax, if after taking into account properly allocable expenses, the net item of income is subject to an effective rate of tax above the statutory threshold.

The high-tax exception is applied on the basis of the items of gross income of a tested unit of a CFC, rather than the CFC as a whole. All tested units of a CFC in the same country are generally grouped together to determine the effective foreign tax rate for the purpose of applying the high-tax exclusion. The approach minimizes the blending of tax rates within a CFC and is thought to provide a more accurate idea of the income subject to a high-rate of foreign tax.

The election to exclude high-taxed income from gross tested income is generally made or revoked for a one-year period.

Proposed Regulations Single Election

The proposed regulations provide for a single election under Code Sec. 954(b)(4) for purposes of both subpart F and GILTI, based on the final GILTI high-tax exclusion regulations.

Under the proposed regulations:

• the election is made with respect to all members of a CFC group (rather than on a CFC-by-CFC basis);
• the determination of whether income is high taxed is made on a tested unit-by-unit basis;
• the determination of high tax income is simplified by grouping certain income that would otherwise qualify as subpart F income with income that would otherwise qualify as tested income for purposes of determining the effective foreign tax rate, and for purposes of the high-tax exception; and
• the method for allocating and apportioning deductions to items of gross income is modified for purposes of the high-tax exception.